How do you like this site? We would love to hear from you! Take a short survey or

Minimize numerical involvement

Too many cooks spoil the broth

Minimize the number of departments, groups and persons involved in a business process

Reijers, H., & Liman Mansar, S. (2005). Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33(4)

category: Organization
class: Resource Rules
frameworkAspect: Org-.structure
perspective: organizational/resource

Description

Performance considerations

Employing this approach should mitigate coordination issues. Time saved on coordination can be allocated to case processing. Decreasing department count could reduce shared responsibilities, akin to the split responsibilities approach. Yet, it might hinder expertise development (quality concern) and routine efficiency (cost concern).

Share this pattern

Enjoy these

Foundational free Patterns

Combine activities

Combine small activities into composite activities

Assign cases

Let workers perform as many steps as possible for single cases

Appoint case managers

Assign a responsible individual for handling each case type

Distinguish case types

Determine whether activities are related to the same type of case and, if necessary, distinguish new business processes

Isolate exceptions

Design business processes for typical cases and isolate exceptional cases from the normal flow

Resequence activities

Move activities to more appropriate places

Offer location flexibility

Let customers interact with the company wherever they want to

Offer Customer self-service

Offer customers the possibility to serve themselves

Department-based assignment

Distribute tasks by interdepartmental interactions to enable or restrict involvement

Back

Share this

Connected to

Reduce touchpoints

Reduce the number of contacts with customers and third parties

Deploy extra resources

If capacity is insufficient, consider increasing the available number of resources

What's Happening?